www.democraticexcellence.com - editor@democraticexcellence.com - 770-474-2655
211 Orchard Road, Rex, Ga 30273
May 25, 2004
The Richard Clark ExposeBy Jeff Goolsby, Editor
I have not read the Richard Clark book but I heard him on Television interviews several times. Richard Clark has confirmed most of the statements I have made about my analysis of what happened regarding the terrorist situation. He has been too polite in his statements about the events and why they occurred.
Mr. Clark said that President Bush had ignored the warnings about the terrorist and he indicated that perhaps Bush did not understand the importance of what was being said.
My take on that is altogether different from the way Clark explained it. It has been pointed out by numerous people that Bush wanted to start a war with Iraq and was waiting for an event that would get the American public emotionally behind him to support the war. Bush needed some catastrophic event to be able to get the American citizens to support his war against Iraq and when he was made aware that the terrorist attack was imminent in this country, obviously, he was delighted and anxious for it to happen.
It is common historical knowledge that any ruler of a country that starts a war without getting the support of the citizens, will not be successful in their war effort. The fact that Bush has gone to extremes to try to prevent any investigation into the events prior to 911, indicates strongly that he has something to hide. Clearly, Bush's war-hawk cronies have been sifting through everything in an effort to conceal any evidence that he knew that the 911 attack was about to occur.
The most suspicious and telltale piece of evidence is that suddenly he had to go to Florida and teach a kindergarten class on the day his residence was a target. This of course is not part of his job requirement. It is extremely probable that one or the other of the two planes headed for Washington was scheduled to hit the White House.
Clearly, there was enough information coming in to FBI and CIA regarding the fact that numerous Muslims were taking flight training for large planes and were not taking any training to learn how to take-off or land the planes. It would be impossible for the people in charge of FBI and CIA to be too stupid to not relay that information in to the president and to not make preparations to prevent whatever it was that these people were trying to develop skills to accomplish, unless they were ordered to allow the terrorist attack to happen.
It is common knowledge that everyone working for the president is required to protect the president from any problems and if they do not, they are fired. That protection also goes to the point of cover-up. The Nixon and Reagan Whitehouse did considerable cover-up but it appears that the Bush Administration is going to do more cover-up than those two combined.
Clark stated that the Clinton Administration prevented numerous attacks but they did fail to prevent some of them and some retaliation that would have and should have occurred during the Clinton Administration was due to either inadequate information or some reason was determined to be not sufficient enough to do the retaliation.
Bush claiming to be such a preventer of terrorist that the first terrorist attack against the United States that occurred on his watch happened when he was being well supplied with information that a terrorist attack was imminent and that the Muslim fanatics were taking training learning how to fly large planes without any training for taking-off or landing the planes. This made it extremely clear that they had no intention of landing a plane after they commandeered it. I took flying lessons once and the first requirement was to learn how to take off and land the plane.
Clark said that there was no evidence that would justify invading Iraq. He said that we should not have invaded Iraq. He said that the inspections and containment were working and that Saddam had not made any effort to attack the United States. He said that the unnecessary invasion of Iraq has inflamed Muslims worldwide and has created a magnet for recruiting new people into the terrorist activity. The terrorist activity has increased a huge amount since Bush invaded Iraq. Small terrorist units have sprung up worldwide and are creating considerable havoc since the Bush Iraq Invasion started.
There are many countries that are ruled by dictators. When dictators gain power, it is usually done by killing lots of people and to stay in power they kill everyone who attempts to oppose them to avoid being overthrown. This is precisely what Saddam Hussein was doing by killing the people who were trying to eliminate him. This is very typical for dictators and we can not afford to invade all of the countries that have dictators. Besides, the other countries do not have the world's second largest oil reserve.
Speaking of oil, I recently learned that Bush has been financing a rebel group in venezuela who have been trying to overthrow their elected president, Hugo Chavez. Venezuela just happens to be one of our major suppliers of crude oil. This makes the second country with a large supply of crude oil that Bush is trying to control.
Today, the Republican Congress and Bush claiming that presidents and vice presidents should not be required to testify under oath, and individually, about something as serious as a terrorist attack. Plus, there is considerable suspicion that President Bush knew in advance that it was going to happen. Or, should have known it was going to happen, and should have made some effort to prevent the attack.
All of this despite the fact that the Republican Congress and Republican Starr forced President Clinton to testify under oath about a personal matter that had nothing to do with Federal government business or public safety during a phony investigation of Clinton about Whitewater, which President Clinton was a victim not a perpetrator. Clearly, Starr learned within one or two days that Clinton was not involved in management of Whitewater subdivision development. When President Clinton testified, the Republicans claimed he committed perjury when legally and technically, he did not, but he did not volunteer any information that they wanted.
Furthermore, the Monica Lewinsky incident was clearly a Republican sting entrapment operation as harassment because they were jealous of the superb job President Clinton was doing. The American public was not harmed by President Clinton, however, the harassment was clearly done to hinder and prevent President Clinton from doing his job, a treasonous act by the Republicans.
In President Bush's case, he deliberately lied or mislead the American public many many times regarding the terrorist so that he could start a war with Iraq, which has killed more than 800 Americans and crippled several thousand Americans, plus killed and maimed many thousands of Iraqis.
Plus, Bush's invasion of Iraq has multiplied the intensity and activity of terrorist worldwide and made a huge increase in risk to America.
Even though President Bush was pretending to be ignoring the information he was receiving about terrorist before the terrorist attack, immediately after the 911 attack, he seemed to be completely aware of where the training was being done, the location of Osama bin Laden and he was ready to start fighting the terrorist in Afghanistan.
This belies his position prior to the 911 attack. The facts have surfaced that other sources, in addition to Clark, that prior to the 911 attack, Bush was getting briefings from CIA and FBI about terrorist activity every day preceding the 911 attack, yet Bush claimed that he had no knowledge or suspicion of the impending terrorist attack.
It has also become adequate knowledge from several sources that Bush started trying to find a way to justify invading Iraq the day after he was inaugurated, and had been tentatively planning to attack Iraq before he stole the presidency. However, the Bush plan for invading Iraq did not include anything beyond killing Saddam Hussein and taking over the oil supply. Clearly, he did not understand that there would be many things that would have to be done after Saddam Hussein was removed from office. Bush's lack of understanding and illiteracy is why he has bungled the aftermath of his invasion.
Mr. Clark said that President Bush had ignored the warnings about the terrorist and he indicated that perhaps Bush did not understand the importance of what was being said.
My take on that is altogether different from the way Clark explained it. It has been pointed out by numerous people that Bush wanted to start a war with Iraq and was waiting for an event that would get the American public emotionally behind him to support the war. Bush needed some catastrophic event to be able to get the American citizens to support his war against Iraq and when he was made aware that the terrorist attack was imminent in this country, obviously, he was delighted and anxious for it to happen.
It is common historical knowledge that any ruler of a country that starts a war without getting the support of the citizens, will not be successful in their war effort. The fact that Bush has gone to extremes to try to prevent any investigation into the events prior to 911, indicates strongly that he has something to hide. Clearly, Bush's war-hawk cronies have been sifting through everything in an effort to conceal any evidence that he knew that the 911 attack was about to occur.
The most suspicious and telltale piece of evidence is that suddenly he had to go to Florida and teach a kindergarten class on the day his residence was a target. This of course is not part of his job requirement. It is extremely probable that one or the other of the two planes headed for Washington was scheduled to hit the White House.
Clearly, there was enough information coming in to FBI and CIA regarding the fact that numerous Muslims were taking flight training for large planes and were not taking any training to learn how to take-off or land the planes. It would be impossible for the people in charge of FBI and CIA to be too stupid to not relay that information in to the president and to not make preparations to prevent whatever it was that these people were trying to develop skills to accomplish, unless they were ordered to allow the terrorist attack to happen.
It is common knowledge that everyone working for the president is required to protect the president from any problems and if they do not, they are fired. That protection also goes to the point of cover-up. The Nixon and Reagan Whitehouse did considerable cover-up but it appears that the Bush Administration is going to do more cover-up than those two combined.
Clark stated that the Clinton Administration prevented numerous attacks but they did fail to prevent some of them and some retaliation that would have and should have occurred during the Clinton Administration was due to either inadequate information or some reason was determined to be not sufficient enough to do the retaliation.
Bush claiming to be such a preventer of terrorist that the first terrorist attack against the United States that occurred on his watch happened when he was being well supplied with information that a terrorist attack was imminent and that the Muslim fanatics were taking training learning how to fly large planes without any training for taking-off or landing the planes. This made it extremely clear that they had no intention of landing a plane after they commandeered it. I took flying lessons once and the first requirement was to learn how to take off and land the plane.
Clark said that there was no evidence that would justify invading Iraq. He said that we should not have invaded Iraq. He said that the inspections and containment were working and that Saddam had not made any effort to attack the United States. He said that the unnecessary invasion of Iraq has inflamed Muslims worldwide and has created a magnet for recruiting new people into the terrorist activity. The terrorist activity has increased a huge amount since Bush invaded Iraq. Small terrorist units have sprung up worldwide and are creating considerable havoc since the Bush Iraq Invasion started.
There are many countries that are ruled by dictators. When dictators gain power, it is usually done by killing lots of people and to stay in power they kill everyone who attempts to oppose them to avoid being overthrown. This is precisely what Saddam Hussein was doing by killing the people who were trying to eliminate him. This is very typical for dictators and we can not afford to invade all of the countries that have dictators. Besides, the other countries do not have the world's second largest oil reserve.
Speaking of oil, I recently learned that Bush has been financing a rebel group in venezuela who have been trying to overthrow their elected president, Hugo Chavez. Venezuela just happens to be one of our major suppliers of crude oil. This makes the second country with a large supply of crude oil that Bush is trying to control.
Today, the Republican Congress and Bush claiming that presidents and vice presidents should not be required to testify under oath, and individually, about something as serious as a terrorist attack. Plus, there is considerable suspicion that President Bush knew in advance that it was going to happen. Or, should have known it was going to happen, and should have made some effort to prevent the attack.
All of this despite the fact that the Republican Congress and Republican Starr forced President Clinton to testify under oath about a personal matter that had nothing to do with Federal government business or public safety during a phony investigation of Clinton about Whitewater, which President Clinton was a victim not a perpetrator. Clearly, Starr learned within one or two days that Clinton was not involved in management of Whitewater subdivision development. When President Clinton testified, the Republicans claimed he committed perjury when legally and technically, he did not, but he did not volunteer any information that they wanted.
Furthermore, the Monica Lewinsky incident was clearly a Republican sting entrapment operation as harassment because they were jealous of the superb job President Clinton was doing. The American public was not harmed by President Clinton, however, the harassment was clearly done to hinder and prevent President Clinton from doing his job, a treasonous act by the Republicans.
In President Bush's case, he deliberately lied or mislead the American public many many times regarding the terrorist so that he could start a war with Iraq, which has killed more than 800 Americans and crippled several thousand Americans, plus killed and maimed many thousands of Iraqis.
Plus, Bush's invasion of Iraq has multiplied the intensity and activity of terrorist worldwide and made a huge increase in risk to America.
Even though President Bush was pretending to be ignoring the information he was receiving about terrorist before the terrorist attack, immediately after the 911 attack, he seemed to be completely aware of where the training was being done, the location of Osama bin Laden and he was ready to start fighting the terrorist in Afghanistan.
This belies his position prior to the 911 attack. The facts have surfaced that other sources, in addition to Clark, that prior to the 911 attack, Bush was getting briefings from CIA and FBI about terrorist activity every day preceding the 911 attack, yet Bush claimed that he had no knowledge or suspicion of the impending terrorist attack.
It has also become adequate knowledge from several sources that Bush started trying to find a way to justify invading Iraq the day after he was inaugurated, and had been tentatively planning to attack Iraq before he stole the presidency. However, the Bush plan for invading Iraq did not include anything beyond killing Saddam Hussein and taking over the oil supply. Clearly, he did not understand that there would be many things that would have to be done after Saddam Hussein was removed from office. Bush's lack of understanding and illiteracy is why he has bungled the aftermath of his invasion.
Copyright © 2004, by Jeff Goolsby, Rex, Georgia, All Rights Reserved